Dittenfass v. Horsley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, David Horsley and others, from orders of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of June, 1916, denying the appellants’ separate motions for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of an amended complaint and amended answers thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
The pleadings are an amended complaint, separate answers by the appellants and replies to defenses relating to the validity and enforcibility of the alleged contract on which the action is based as affected by the non-payment of the stamp tax imposed *144by the provisions of section 270 of the Tax Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 60 [Laws of 1909, chap. 62], added by Laws of. 1910, chap. 38, as amd. by Laws of 1912, chap. 292).*
This is a suit in equity for the specific performance of an agreement in writing made by the appellant, William Horsley, on the 8th day of February, 1913. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Jones v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Booth v. MillikenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Genevetz v. FeieringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Stokes v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Accounting of BecherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- Crocker v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Grosso v. SporerNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Schuyler v. Kirk Brown Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919
- Schuyler v. Kirk-Brown Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.