Legal Opinion

Genevetz v. Feiering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, by the plaintiff, Sam Genevetz, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of'the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 1st day of July, 1909, upon the decision of the court,-rendered after a trial at the Kings C-ounty Special Term, dismissing the complaint upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J.:

The vendees in an action for the sale of real estate assigned the contract to the plaintiff, who brought an action for specific per: formalice, uniting as defendants Feiering,'the vendor; Friedman, the purchaser from Feiering; Fromson, a purchaser from Friedman, and McGuire, a purchaser-of part of the property from Fromsori. The court found that the complaint should be dismissed as to Fromson, McGuire and Friedman, and that no cause of. action in equity was established as to any other defendants, and that the plaintiff have an order placing the case as to Feiering upon the calendar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wadick v. . MacENew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Hugel v. HabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dittenfass v. HorsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. H. & H. Corp. v. Broad Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Arrow Holding Corp. v. McLaughlin's SonsNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Epstein v. GluckinNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Epstein v. KroopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API