Legal Opinion

Grosso v. Sporer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In December, 1900, there was executed and delivered to the defendant and his wife a deed conveying to “ Joseph Sporer and Christina Sporer, his wife,” the premises described in the complaint. By such conveyance the defendant and Christina Sporer, as husband and wife, acquired title to such premises as tenants by the entirety. As such owners they took possession and occupied the same as their home up to the 1st day of June, 1923. On June 1, 1923, the defendant made and executed a written lease of such premises to Attilio DiFiore for the term of one year and one month, at the rental of fifty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Cockcroft v. New York & Harlem RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Campbell v. PragueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Van KleeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Coppola v. FredstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Charles v. ScheibelNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Holdridge v. RobertsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  5. Potts v. Moran's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API