Legal Opinion

The Delaware

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 10, 1933No. 413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The subject-matter of this litigation is a collision which occurred on November 22, 192,7, at about 6 o’clock in the evening, between the steamship Delaware and barges in tow of the tug Socony No. 1. Standard Transportation Company, owner of the tug and barges, filed a libel against the Delaware. Clyde Steamship Company, owner of the steamship, filed a cross-libel against the tug. The suits were consolidated and heard together. Both parties have appealed from an interlocutory decree which awarded to each half damages against the other. Each appellant, contends that its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The George H. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. UrsoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Libelant-Appellee v. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Norfolk & Washington, D. C., Steamboat Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Black Point S. S. Co. v. Reading Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  5. Tug New York Co. v. The Robin DoncasterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API