Legal Opinion
New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Libelant-Appellee v. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 16, 1956No. 23909_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.
This case arose out of a collision in the East River between a carfloat in tow of the Baltimore & Ohio’s tug William J. Dickey and a carfloat in tow of the New York, New Haven and Hartford’s tug Transfer No. 15. The New Haven brought a suit against the B. & O. in admiralty to recover for the damages resulting from the collision. Judge Galston found the Dickey at fault and gave judgment for the libellant for the entire damages. From this judgment the respondent appeals.
Judge Galston found the facts as follows:
The Transfer No. 15 left the vicinity of the float bridges of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Ludvig HolbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Compania De Maderas De Caibarien, S. A. v. The Queenston Heights, Etc., Esso Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The San SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Seaboard Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Rederi Ab/disaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kevin Lovuolo and Antonio Musto v. John Gunning and Elaine GunningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Inland Tugs Company and American Barge Line Co. v. The Ohio River Company, Defendant-Third Party and United States of America, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- John I. Hay Co. v. M/V Dorothy I. SouthernDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Albatross Tanker Corp. v. S.S. Amoco DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Bucolo, Inc. v. S/V JaguarDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.