Legal Opinion

State v. Cardinas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. J„ P. Richardson. This is one of a large number of suits brought under “An act to ascertain and adjudicate certain claims for land against the State, situated between the Nueces and Rio Grande rivers,” approved August 15, 1870, (Paschal’s Dig., art. 7068.) The first section of the act will be found in the statement of the succeeding case.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. J„ P. Richardson. This is one of a large number of suits brought under “An act to ascertain and adjudicate certain claims for land against the State, situated between the Nueces and Rio Grande rivers,” approved August 15, 1870, (Paschal’s Dig., art. 7068.) The first section of the act will be found in the statement of the succeeding case. (State v. Cuellar, post, 295.) Sections 2 and 6 of the same act are as follows, viz: “ Seo. 2. That each of the claimants shall, at the time of filing of said claim, accompany the same with an affidavit, made…

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This action was brought under

the law of the 15th of August, 1870, entitled “An act to ascertain and adjudicate certain claims for land against the State, situated between the Nueces and Eio Grande rivers.” The claims of land are situated in the territory of Texas that formerly constituted a part of the State of Tamaulipas, in Mexico, which remained, for the most part, under the political and civil jurisdiction of that State, until possession of the same was taken by the troops of the United States, in 1846. It embraced the country between those rivers, “below a line…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Owings v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Paschal v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Lambert v. WeirTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Titus v. KimbroTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Mapes v. Leal's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. FantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Munk v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. McCarty v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Southwestern Surety Insurance v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Von Rosenberg v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API