Legal Opinion

Von Rosenberg v. Haynes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1892No. 8186PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant having made locations by virtue of thirty-seven land certificates on the land in controversy, Haynes, the surveyor of the county, refused to make surveys under the locations, on the ground that the land covered by the locations was titled land; whereupon this action was brought to compel him to make and return .surveys.

The claimants of the land and the surveyor were made parties defend ant, and on trial, without a jury, the court held that the land was not subject to location.

It was claimed by defendants that the land covered by the locations was a part of two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Downing v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. JarvisTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. CardinasTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. State of Texas v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Price v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Sullivan v. SolisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Playa De Flor Land & Improvement Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API