Legal Opinion

McCann v. Unum Provident

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 31, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-3241 (MLC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Kevin M. McCann, M.D., brings this action against, among others, the defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, sued here as “Unum Provident” (“Provident”). (See generally dkt. entry no. 1, Compl., Count I.) McCann alleges that he purchased a supplemental long-term disability (“LTD”) insurance policy (“the Policy”) from Provident in 1991. He also alleges that Provident, in 2008, determined that he was “totally disabled” under the terms of the Policy and eligible for monthly benefit payments, and began issuing…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kevin McCann v. Unum ProvidentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Gooden v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016
  3. Hawkins v. Globe Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Van Arsdel v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. D'Elia v. Unum Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API