Pearcy v. Stranahan
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. The facts, which involve the political status of the Isle ' of Pines and whether it is under the jurisdiction of Cuba or that of the United States, and whether merchandise therefrom is subject to duty, as coming, from a foreign country within the méaning of the Dingley Tariff Act, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
■ Plaintiff brought his' action in the Circuit Court of the United States for. the Southérn District of New York against the then collector of the port of New York to recover the value of certain cigars seized by him, which had been brought to that port from- the Isle of Pines, whfere they had. been produced and manufactured. This seizure was made under the Dingley Act,, so called (act July 24, 1897, 30 Stat. 151, c. 11), and the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury thereunder. The Dingley Act provided for the imposition of duties “ on articles imported from foreign countries,” and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Neely v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wheaton v. SextonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Greeson v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Hichino Uyeno v. AchesonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1951
- Lin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Byrne Realty Co. v. South Florida Farms Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.