Legal Opinion

Pickett v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1983No. 82-5576PublishedCited by 271 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

This case requires us to decide the constitutionality of a provision of a Tennessee statute 1 that imposes a 2-year limitations period on paternity and child support actions brought on behalf of certain illegitimate children.

Under Tennessee law both fathers and mothers are responsible for the support of their minor children. See Tenn. Code Ann. §34-101 (1977); Rose Funeral Home, Inc. v. Julian, 176 Tenn. 534, 539, 144 S. W. 2d 755, 757 (1940); Brooks v. Brooks, 166 Tenn. 255, 257, 61 S. W. 2d 654 (1933). This duty of support is enforceable throughout the child’s minority. See Blackburn v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by271 opinions

  1. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Etheridge v. Medical Center HospitalsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API