Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1916No. Civ. No. 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facte are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Upon a former appeal by the defendant in this case the judgment was affirmed (22 Cal. App. 461, [134 Pac. 801]). The judgment on appeal was rendered July 7, 1913; became final August 6, 1913; an application for a rehearing in the supreme court was denied within thirty days thereafter; a remittitur from this court went down to the superior court on September 8, 1913. Thereafter respondent filed her memorandum of costs, and appellant applied to the superior court for an order to strike out the memorandum of costs on the ground that the same had been illegally filed, and also demanded that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Bank of Woodland v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wheat v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Countryman v. California Trona Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API