Legal Opinion

Countryman v. California Trona Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1919No. Civ. No. 2511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

On a former appeal by the defendant in ■this action the judgment of the lower court was sustained. (35 Cal. App. 728, [170 Pac. 1069].) Upon the going down of the remittitur the plaintiff duly filed a memorandum of his costs on appeal. A motion to have the costs taxed was made by defendant, which motion was denied and defendant appeals.

The memorandum of costs is entitled “Memorandum of Costs and Disbursements on Behalf of Plaintiff on Appeal from Judgment, Including the Order Denying Motion for New Trial,” and the item therein objected to is as follows:

“1914, April 15. To amount actually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Countryman v. California Trona Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Treat v. OgdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API