Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from orders refusing a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW. J.
In the above-entitled cases the defendant in each thereof appeals from the judgment rendered against it, and from an order made therein denying its motion for a new trial.
J. 0. Eaton is the husband of Jennie Eaton, and William A. Barnett is the husband of Nellie I. Barnett.
In each ease the action is one to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a vehicle occupied by J. 0. Eaton, with whom his wife and Mrs. Barnett were riding, and a switch engine operated by defendant over its tracks across Milpas Street in the city of Santa Barbara, upon which the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Hinkle v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- King v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Dickinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.