New Hampshire Banking Co. v. Ball
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Kingman District Court. Son. W. O. JBashore, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
An action was brought by the New Hampshire Banking Company against Hiram L. Ball and Eva Ball to recover upon a promissory note given by them for $2,000, and to foreclose a mortgage which they had given as security for the payment of the note. Other persons who claimed an interest in the real estate were made parties. Within four months thereafter, Hiram L. Ball, who held the legal title to the mortgaged land, died and left surviving him his wife and three sons. Within a year from his death a motion was made to revive the action against the administrator of the estate, and the heirs, and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Amos v. Humboldt Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henry v. EddeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Glenn v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Obermeier v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Van Sant v. WentworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.