Legal Opinion
In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 2, 1932No. 23082 to 23088, InclusivePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This court is confronted with a motion of protestant, S.P. Freeling, in these causes, whereby it is sought to dismiss these actions now pending in this court. The motion is resisted by Honorable Baxter Taylor and other attorneys appearing for petitioners (appellees) in oral argument. The grounds for dismissal are:(1) That the cost of litigation, by way of payment of witness fees, is prohibitive.(2) That on December 18, 1931, a purported election was held throughout this state on four of said initiated measures, and the election officials, having acted "under color" of official title and under…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. CapshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Veazie v. WadleighSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Avery v. Jayhawker Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Brown v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shelton v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Tiffany v. TiffanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Nealis v. KnechtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Robbins v. City of Del CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Associated Industries v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.