Kaminsky v. Milwaukee Acceptance Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
We deem the controlling issues to be:
1. Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the trial court’s belief that the appellant could produce the records sought?
2. Is this case a proper case for the invocation of sec. 295.02, Stats., providing for summary punishment?
Mr. Kaminsky’s defense before the circuit court consisted of an absolute denial of possession of the records sought and denial of knowledge of their whereabouts. He argues on appeal, therefore, that he is being compelled to do something which is not within his power to do.
Appellant is correct in his assertion that it is essential in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dietz v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- In re RosenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Mitchell v. WESTERN CASAULTY & SURETY CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Rubin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Upper Lakes Shipping, Ltd. v. Seafarers' International UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Balaam v. BalaamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- CONTEMPT IN STATE v. DewerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.