Legal Opinion

Ayres v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 29, 2005No. 04-987CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

RELEVANT FACTS1

On February 12, 2002, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) acquired property located at 2710 Classen Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland (the “Property”) after the former owner defaulted on an FHA-insured mortgage. See PI. OppApp. Ex. 16; see also Gov’t App. at 19.2 When the Property was acquired, HUD assigned Michaelson, Connor & Boul, Inc. (“Michaelson”) to be the contractor responsible for the management and disposition of the Property. See Gov’t App. at 20. On February 15, 2002, AAA Appraisers prepared a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Ayres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. McClellan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API