Legal Opinion
Lee v. Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 16, 2016No. Case No. 12-cv-05064-JSCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
This action arises out of the attempted collection of debt incurred by Plaintiff Andrew Lee (“Plaintiff’) as a result of his alleged misuse of his employee discount and for changing the oil on his car while at work at Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California (“Pep Boys”). Plaintiff alleges that the settlement demand letter that Defendants Palmer Rei-fler & Associates (“Palmer”) and Patricia Hastings (“Hastings”) sent to him violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brooks v. Bank of America, NADistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Hueso v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021