Legal Opinion
Lato v. Concord Homes, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1983No. 46909PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAERTNER, Judge.
On April 23, 1968 appellants entered into a contract with respondents for the purchase of a newly constructed home. Occupancy commenced on May 28, 1968. Appellants allege that within a few months thereafter, they began to sustain damage by reason of a stopped up lateral sanitary sewer line which was constructed with an inadequate pitch or degree of fall. They further allege that this condition continues to exist resulting in continuing intermittent damage and expense.
Appellants commenced this action on August 12,1976. Their Second Amended Petition, filed April 23, 1982 is in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Davis v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Neal v. Laclede Gas CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sam Kraus Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Linda S. Nettles v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Cooper v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Clarice King v. Nashua Corporation and H.S. CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Anderson v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.