Legal Opinion

Clarice King v. Nashua Corporation and H.S. Crocker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1985No. 84-1918PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of Clarice King’s claims of personal injury brought against Nashua Corporation (Nashua) and H.S. Crocker, Inc. (Crocker). The federal district court, the Honorable James H, Meredith, held that King’s claims were barred by both the Illinois and Missouri statutes of limitation. King v. Nashua Corp., 587 F.Supp. 417 (E.D.Mo.1984). Upon review we affirm the orders of dismissal of the district court.

King was a meat wrapper for some twenty-six years. She resided in Missouri and worked at A & P stores in that state. In February 1977, King was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Chemical Workers Basic Union Local No. 1744 v. Arnold Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Renfroe v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Morgan Distributing Company, Inc. v. Unidynamic Corporation (Formerly Known as Umc Industries, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. Gurfein v. Sovereign GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. McKinney v. Fairchild International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Earl v. Cryovac, a Division of W.R. Grace Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Cook v. DeSoto Fuels, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API