Legal Opinion

Neal v. Laclede Gas Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1974No. 35430PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Acting Presiding Judge.

Defendant Laclede Gas Company appeals from a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs W. Ray Neal and his wife, Virginia Neal, in the amount of $700.00. The primary issue on this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ action was barred by the statute of limitations. We find that the applicable statutory period had elapsed before plaintiffs commenced their action, and therefore we reverse the judgment.

In March, 1964 plaintiffs purchased an air conditioning and furnace system from defendant. The purchase price was approximately $1,400.00. This cooling and heating system…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  3. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. The Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Chemical Workers Basic Union Local No. 1744 v. Arnold Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Owen v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Meier v. Alfa-Laval, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. De Paul Hospital School of Nursing, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. City of Bedford v. The James Leffel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API