Legal Opinion
Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 30, 1999No. 91,714PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAYLOR, J.
11 Plaintiffs, Paul Tibbetts, Erwin Olds, Mary Dittmeyer, and Mary Pittman, and Defendant, Sight 'n Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., appeal the trial court's order denying attorney's fees and costs in this class action lawsuit brought under the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, where a violation of the Act was shown but no damages were awarded. After a review of the record and applicable law, we reverse and remand with instructions.
12 Plaintiffs are representatives of a class of consumers who purchased Defendant's products. In doing so, Plaintiffs allegedly relied on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- State Ex Rel. MacY v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Weeks v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Barnhill v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003