Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. MacY v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1991No. 76648, 76789PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
In these cases of first impression, 1 we are asked to determine whether fines and costs associated with convictions for possession of a controlled dangerous substance with the intent to distribute and possession of a controlled dangerous substance may be paid from the proceeds of civil forfeiture proceedings brought pursuant to the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act (Controlled Dangerous Substances Act), 63 O.S.Supp.1989 § 2-101 et seq. 2 We find that 63 O.S.Supp.1990 § 2-506(L) 3 provides a mandatory payment schedule for property forfeited pursuant to the Uniform…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Ivers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.