Legal Opinion

Yates v. Tiffiny

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Action on the case to recover damages for obstructing a public highway. General demurrer filed and overruled. Exception reserved.

The declaration sets out that the defendant erected a fence and budding upon a certain public highway in Camden known as Cottage Street over which the plaintiffs had a right to travel.

*129An obstruction placed within the limits of a public way is a nuisance at common law and by statute. R. S., Chap. 23, Sec. 5. Smith v. Preston, 104 Me., 156; Corthell v. Holmes, 88 Me., 376. One who has sustained special damage from a common nuisance may recover therefor in an action on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graham v. MasonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foley v. H. F. Farnham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  2. Smedberg v. Moxie Dam Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. Fleming v. Florida State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API