Graham v. Mason
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Exceptions to the master’s report of profits made by the defendant [William Mason] from his infringement of reissued letters patent [No. 2,626] granted Edmund H. Graham ,and Wanton Rouse, May 27,1867. The original patent [No. 30,441] was granted to Graham October 16, 1860.
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPLEX, Circuit Judge.
The master reports in this case that since the date of the last reissue of the plaintiffs’ letters patent, May 28, 1867, the defendant “has manufactured certain ‘bridle-motions,’ ” being the same mechanism pronounced by the court to be an infringement of the plaintiffs’ patent in this case; and he annexes an account of the profits resulting from this manufacture, in- a schedule marked A, making a part of his report. The master further reports that the defendant made and sold said “bridle-motions” after said reissue, with and as a part of looms manufactured in his…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
- Leavitt v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
- Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1917
- Yates v. TiffinySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.