Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
These causes were appeals from the chancery side of the circuit court of the district of Columbia for the county of Alexandria. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and the controversy is'the same as in the suits between the same parties reported in 1 Cranch, 321., and 5 Cranch, 262. The causes were argued by Taylor and Swann# for'Hepburn & Dundas, and . by Jones and Leef for Dunlop & Company.
1Opinion of the CourtWashington, J.
These causes comebefore the court upon appeals from the circuit court of the district, of Columbia, for the county of Alexandria. The material facts upon which the questions now to be decided arise, are as follows:
Hepburn & Dundas being indebted to John Dun-lop .& Co., of Great Britain, on account of certain mercantile dealings which had taken place between those parties, t;he precise amount whereof was disputed, an agreement in writing was entered into on the 27th of September, 1799, between the said Hepburn' & Dundas, and Colin Auld, the attorney in fact of John Dunlop & Co.; whereby it was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hepburn & Dundas v. AuldSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
3Cited by88 opinions
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.