Legal Opinion

Deen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2018No. WD 80643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynthia L. Martin, Judge

Desmond Deen ("Deen") appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Deen argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his mental capacity at the time of his offenses and at the time of his guilty plea. Finding no error, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In February 2012, Deen was charged by indictment with domestic assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, and misdemeanor assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree. These charges arose after Deen threw…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fonville v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Miguel Torres v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Russell Donald Walker v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Stanley Barber v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API