Legal Opinion

Wallar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2013No. WD 75103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.

Nicholas Wallar appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 In his motion, Wallar claimed that he should be discharged from his convictions due to an alleged systemic failure of the Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office to comply with the disclosure obligations of Rule 25.03. The motion court rejected Wallar’s claim, finding that it had been waived by the entry of his guilty pleas, that Wallar failed to plausibly demonstrate materiality of the information sought, and that Wallar’s testimony…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. Garris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. DormireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Lynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Ivan Mitchell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Heller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Klarr v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API