Hudson v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Assuming that, under the facts, there was an irregularity in the procedure followed, which would justify the dismissal of the proceedings on motion, if made in due season, then we have a case where the defendant was brought into the City Court in an informal way, and in that court made no objection to the informality, but, on the contrary, agreed to the jurisdiction of that court, by stipulation, and was duly bound over to the Court of Common Pleas and therein appeared.
By his stipulation and conduct the defendant has waived any right he may have had to- question the jurisdiction of the Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Spencer's Appeal From Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- D'Andrea v. RendeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Turner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Esten v. MatsenConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
- Seifert v. AprilConnecticut Superior Court · 1935