Legal Opinion
D'Andrea v. Rende
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 9, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The complaint is in the form of an action to quiet title. Subsequent pleadings reveal that the defendant claims to have an attachment hen on property owned by the plaintiffs. The object of the plaintiffs is to remove the lien of this attachment.
On April 22d, 1930, Patsey Prince conveyed the premises described in the complaint to Max H. Mernstein, trustee. On May 29th, 1930, the defendant caused these premises to be attached in an action returnable to the City Court of Stamford wherein Prince and Mernstein, trustee, were defendants. The certificate of attachment was duly recorded.
Soon after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sears v. TerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Sachs v. NussenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Terry's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Savings Bank of Danbury v. DownsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Dorrance v. RaynsfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DeGennaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Varanelli v. LuddySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Potter v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.