Esten v. Matsen
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The instant pleading is, in reality, a plea in abatement in form and very probably, intention.
The question which it raises, however, is not a mere matter of abatement, but one of jurisdiction of the court to adjudicate concerning the cause.
The writ describes the defendants as residents of this state who live in Fairfield.
As concerns the service of process upon residents of this state, one means, only, is provided for by statute, vis., that described in General Statutes, Rev. 1930, #5468.
It appears from the return of the officer to whom service ‘of process was committed, that he did not comply…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Woodmont Ass'n v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Equitable Trust Co. v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burger v. FrohlichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967