Legal Opinion
City of Enid v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 24, 1928No. 18305PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of (Garfield county on June 27, 1922, by Lydia M. (Brooks, as plaintiff, against the city of Enid, as defendant, for damages by reason of certain inconveniences and annoyances alleged to have been caused said plaintiff by the defendant’s negligent operation of its sanitary sewer system during the two years next preceding the filing of the action. The petition alleged that plaintiff was the owner of 160 acres of farm land adjoining the city of Enid on the southeast, and had her residence located thereon; that the city of Enid, about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- City of Cushing v. HighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ponca Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mildred O. Ward, Guardian Ad Litem of Robert Fred Ward, a Minor, and Gladys Mitchell v. Myrtle Marie BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- City of Edmond v. BillenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Incorporated Town of Chelsea v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941