Legal Opinion

City of Cushing v. High

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1918No. 9447PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Distx-ict 'Oourt, Payne County; John P. Hickam, Judge. Suit by N. H. High against the City of Cushing. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

High sued the city of Oushing to recover damages alleged to have been caused to him by the construction and maintenance of a septic tank in close proximity to his land, on which he resided with his family. This tank was erected in October, 1914, and for a time the ■filter operated successfully, but ' finally failed to properly pex-form its function, ana the sewerage overflowed and polluted a stream of water which flowed through the land of the defendant in error, and rendered the same incapable of being used for feeding purposes, and the stench therefrom made the property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Cate v. FanslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. City of New Cordell v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API