Legal Opinion

Noland v. Owens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

HaiNee, J.:

This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a commission alleged to be due for negotiating, as a real estate broker, the sale of real estate. *

The plaintiff, in his petition, alleges that he was employed by the defendant to secure a purchaser for certain <real estate owned by the defendant and situated in the city of El Beno, Oklahoma. That pursuant to such employment, he secured for the defendant a purchaser, to-wit: Dick T. Morgan, who was able, ready and willing to purchase said property, and who offered to pay $11,000.00…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. First National Bank of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Gillette, Libby v. Murphy, Carroll, BroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. City of Guthrie v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. National Bank of Guthrie v. EarlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Kramer v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Billy v. Le Flore County Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. KernsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Cardin Bldg. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Earl v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API