Gillette, Libby v. Murphy, Carroll, Brough
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Gourt of Canadian County; before J. C. Tarsney, District Judge. Action by Murphy, Carroll & Brough and others against Gillette & Libby and others. Judgment.for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burwbll, J.:
The above-named defendants in error commenced an action in the district court of Canadian county on February 22, 1897, to enjoin the defendants (in that suit) T. R. Jackson and Gillette & Libby, from assigning or in any way transfering a certain judgment rendered in that court against the board of county commissioners of Canadian county," and in favor of T. R. Jackson, which judgment Jackson had previously assigned to Gillette & Libby; but plaintiffs claimed that they were the equitable-owners thereof.
The facts leading up to the present suit are about as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Brill v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hockaday v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Seibert v. First Nat. Bank of OkeeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.