Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. First National Bank of Cambridge

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1890No. 223PublishedCited by 32 opinions

ERROR TÓ THE OIROUIT COURT'QF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ district of Massachusetts. The Case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford

This is- an action at law, brought .in the Circuit Court of the United States for the' District of Massachusetts, by a writ, dated September 22-,' 1881, by james S. P. Hathaway against The First National Bank of Cambridge, a national banking .corporation.

The'declaration contains three counts in tort, the. substance of which is that the defendant had converted to its own use certain bonds of the United States, with the interest coupons thereon, the property -of the plaintiff; and that it had con verted- to its own use' the proceeds of the. unlawful and unauthorized sale- by it of such bonds,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The " Francis Wright"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. St. Tammany Water Works v. New Orleans Water WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. McClure v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Brooks v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Canadian Nat. Ry. Co. v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  5. Bourjois, Inc. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API