Legal Opinion
Ohio Edison Co. v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1993No. 92AP-1227PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
In 1984, the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) informed the Ohio Edison Company (“Ohio Edison”) of ODOT’s plans to begin a highway construction project in Richland County. Due to this endeavor, Ohio Edison was required to remove and relocate certain utility equipment which it had situated near the construction site. Apparently, Ohio Edison was apprised of its right to seek relocation costs from ODOT under R.C. 163.51 et seq. and submitted an expense estimate to the agency.
On July 17,1984, E.E. Lonsway, a local utility supervisor with ODOT, informed Ohio Edison in writing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cristino v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Zelenak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Keller v. DaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- TLC Heath Care Servs., L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hull v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.