Legal Opinion

Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 90-2149PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This case presents two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees’ Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss appellant’s claim for intentional tort; and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees’ Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss appellant’s allegation of wrongful discharge. For the following reasons, we hold that appellees’ Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion was improperly granted on both counts. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals regarding the intentional tort claim and affirm its judgment regarding the wrongful discharge claim.

I

Intentional Tort

In his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cantrell v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Stephen B. Himmel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API