Legal Opinion

Eadie v. Chambers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1909No. 1,595PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The principal question in the case is whether the deed from Whittren to the defendant in error, attested as it was by but one witness, was sufficient to convey the title as between the parties thereto. At common law a deed is valid between parties and their privies, if signed, sealed, and delivered, and attestation is no part of its execution. 2 Blackstone, Com. 307; Dole v. Thurlow, 12 Metc. (Mass.) 164; Hepburn v. Dubois, 12 Pet. 345, 9 L.R.A. 1111. In adopting systems of registration of conveyances, about one-half of the states have enacted statutes…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Belton v. . HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Johnson v. SandhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Edwards v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Building CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Waskey v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. James v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Pitney v. PitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Citizens Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API