Legal Opinion

Conlan v. Grace

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1886PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, refusing a new trial after a trial by Brill, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action to determine an adverse claim to real estate. The plaintiffs were the heirs-at-law of Mary Grace, and defendants of John Grace, who, in their life-time, were husband and wife, and both of whom died intestate, in July, 1884, the former on the 19th and the latter on the 29th of that month. The complaint alleged generally that plaintiffs were the owners of the property. The answer alleged that John Grace was, at the time of his decease, the owner in fee-simple and seized of the real estate in question; and alleged the relationship of the defendants to John Grace, showing that they were…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Newton & Seeley v. BealerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Sidenberg v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Van Slyke v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Mondragon v. MondragonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Standiford v. StandifordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Radke v. BrenonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API