Legal Opinion

Waskey v. Chambers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1912No. 221PublishedCited by 22 opinions

CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit brought by the respondent, Chambers, against Waskey and others, to recover possession of a placer mining claim and damages.for gold extracted from the same. Waskey defended under two leases from the parties alleged by him to be the owners. The plaintiff had a verdict and a judgment which was affirmed by a majority of the Circuit Court of Appeals, 172 Fed. Rep. 73, 96 C. C. A. 561. The facts as they are to be taken under the verdict are these. Whittren was the original locator of the claim. He made a deed of a part interest to Chambers, and acknowledged it on April 21, 1902, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eadie v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  2. Alaska Exploration Co. v. Northern Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Building CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. American Toll Bridge Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API