Johnson v. Sandhoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, refusing a new trial, after a trial by Vanderburgh, J., without a jury. The case is stated in the opinion. cited Thompson v. Morgan, 6 Minn. 199, (292;) Barret v. Shaubhut, 5 Minn. 258, (323;) Boss v. Worthing-ton, 11 Minn. 323, (438;) Meighen v. Strong, 6 Minn. Ill, (177;) Everest v. Ferris, 16' Minn. 14, (26.)
1Opinion of the Court
Berry, J.*
Tins is an action in the nature of ejectment. The land in controversy was originally owned by Haley, who, on May 9, 1857, mortgaged it to Wyman. The mortgage had but one witness, but it was, nevertheless, recorded on May 16, 1857. It was conditioned “to pay the sum of-dollars, according to the conditions of two promissory notes made by me, bearing even date herewith.” As to this defect of the unfilled blank, as well as in regard to the discrepancy of dates, we are not inclined to question the finding of the trial court, “that it sufficiently appears what notes were intended to be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brobst v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Phyfe v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Robinson v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Purdy v. . HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Moore v. CordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Rogers v. BentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Jordan v. SayreSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Nash v. Northwest Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.