Legal Opinion
Peter J. Laniok v. Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 18, 1991No. 1357, Docket 90-9089PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Peter Laniok appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Michael A. Telesca, Ch. J., reported at 753 F.Supp. 1115, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Laniok’s claim pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., for benefits allegedly due to him under the terms of the pension plan maintained by his former employer, Brainerd Manufacturing Company (Brainerd). Defendant, the Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Sharkey v. Ultramar Energy Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Campbell v. Alliance National Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- De Pace v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.