Legal Opinion

Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1997No. 94-35770PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FERNANDEZ; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge.

Donna Vizcaino, Jon R. Waite, Mark Stout, Geoffrey Culbert, Lesley Stuart, Thomas Morgan, Elizabeth Spokoiny, and Larry Spo-koiny brought this action on behalf of themselves and a court-certified class (all are hereafter collectively referred to as “the Workers”). They sued Microsoft Corporation and its various pension and welfare plans, including its Savings Plus Plan (SPP), and sought a determination that they were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Republic of Nicaragua, a Foreign Sovereign v. Standard Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company, and Castle & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Meditrust Financial Services Corp. v. Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Worth, Lisa v. Tyer, Robert H.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API