Legal Opinion
De Pace v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 15, 2003No. 1:02-cv-04312PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KORMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Nicholas DePace, Salvatore Di Blasi and Andrew Molinaro brought this ERISA action against Matsushita Electric Corporation (“Matsushita”), the parent company of their former employer Pana sonic, alleging that the company fraudulently induced them to participate in a voluntary resignation program by furnishing them with misleading information as to the pension benefits they could expect. Matsushita moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 12(b)(6).
BACKGROUND
1. Allegations in the Complaint as to Plaintiff DePace
The complaint alleges that on…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Nechis v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Pereira v. Farace - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Amara v. CIGNA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.