State v. Woolery

Defendant was convicted after a bench trial >of criminally negligent homicide. ORS 163.145. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred:(1) In overruling defense counsel’s objection to cross-examination of defendant concerning his general drinking habits;(2) In overruling defendant’s objection to testimony of a pathologist which was based in part upon the contents of charts and tables purporting to show the amount of alcoholic liquor required to be consumed in order to raise the blood alcohol level of a given individual to a given level, and in denying defendant’s motion to strike such…