Legal Opinion
In re Williams Companies Erisa Litigation
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 22, 2005No. 02-CV-153TCKFHM, 02-CV-159HM, 02-CV-285-HM, 02-CV-289-HCPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KERN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Docket No. 57).1 The Court has carefully *418considered the Plaintiffs’ motion, the response and reply thereto, and the supplemental authorities provided by both Plaintiffs and Defendants. After careful review, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that certifying the class at this time will facilitate a fair and efficient resolution of this case.
1. Introduction
Plaintiffs are former employees of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- DiFelice v. US Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
- In re Polaroid Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.