Legal Opinion
Edward B. Marks Music Corp. v. Stasny Music Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order granting summary judgment.
The action is for copyright infringement of a musical composition entitled “Alla en el Rancho Grande” hereinafter called “Rancho.”
The complaint alleges that Silvano R. Ramos, a citizen of the Republic of Mexico, prior to March 10, 1927, assigned to Salvador Cabrera, a Mexican music publisher, the musical composition “Rancho” together with all rights therein, including the right to secure copyright thereon.
On or about April…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. PayneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Vitaphone Corporation v. Hutchinson Amusement Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Warren Education Association v. LapanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Interamerican Refining Corp. v. Texaco Maracaibo, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Kissick Const. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WahooDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Tunnell v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.