Legal Opinion

Ford v. O'Donnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombatter, P. J.

Janies M. O’Donnell died intestate in the year 1886, and the plaintiff became his administrator. The defendant Miles O’Donnell, his son, is one of his heirs and a distributee of his estate. On December 1, 1886, the defendant Miles, for a valuable consideration, assigned and transferred all his interest of every kind in the estate of James M. O’Donnell to A. A. Talmage. Talmage afterwards died leaving a will, under which the defendant Mary qualified as executrix.

In October, 1886, the plaintiff, as such administrator, instituted suit against the defendant Miles on certain promissory notes,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strong v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Ring v. JamisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. First National Bank v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Darks v. Scudder-Gale Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Hopkins v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Ring Refrigerator & Ice-Machine Co. v. St. Louis Ice Manufacturing & Cold-Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1895
  4. Thompson v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Cleveland v. CoulsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API