Legal Opinion

Ring v. Jamison

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. The decision of that court is reported in 2 Mo. Aud. 584. At the trial a witness for the defendant testified that after the death of Peter Lindell, witness and Ring had a conversation, in which witness told Ring that Peter Lin-dell had said that Ring owed him $20,000. Ring, in reply, said, no, that he, Ring, only owed Peter Lindell $700, etc.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. The decision of that court is reported in 2 Mo. Aud. 584. At the trial a witness for the defendant testified that after the death of Peter Lindell, witness and Ring had a conversation, in which witness told Ring that Peter Lin-dell had said that Ring owed him $20,000. Ring, in reply, said, no, that he, Ring, only owed Peter Lindell $700, etc. In rebuttal, plaintiff offered himself as a witness and testified as to the conversation which took place be- ' tween himself and witness, after Peter Lindell’s death. Counsel for defendant objected to plaintiff as…

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

— This cause originated in the probate court *426of St. Louis county, on a demand presented for allowance by plaintiff, against the estate of Peter Lindell, deceased, for the sum of $7,727.75. The account was composed of forty-eight items, all of which were for money lent hy plaintiff to or advanced for Peter Lindell, except an item of $350 for diamond studs alleged to have been sold by plaintiff to said Lindell. The money was paid and advanced by plaintiff at different times, from February 10th, 1868, to August 3rd, 1871. The account had no credits. In the probate court there was a judgment for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Granger v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Looker v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Sitton v. ShippSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Coughlin v. HaeusslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lieber v. LieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Emmel v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Curd v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Wade v. HardySupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API